Growth Hacking or Continuous Discovery? Which Framework Works Better for Your Product?

November 7, 2024
8
min read

If you're into product management, you probably hear these buzzwords: Growth Hacking and Continuous Discovery. There are a lot of opinions on which one is better, but the point is that both find their place in the product lifecycle - and it's very important to know when and how to use each.

It is not about choosing a winner, but about understanding where your product stands and what framework can really help move it ahead. If you happen to be stuck in a dilemma on whether to invest all of your energy in rapid growth experiments or put in the necessary time for continuous improvement, continue reading.

Growth Hacking: The Sprint for Explosive Growth

What is Growth Hacking?

It's all about fast-paced experimentation with marketing, product development, and customer acquisition channels to find the most effective ways to scale a product. The goal? Get as many users as possible, as quickly as possible. This is the playbook used by Facebook, Airbnb, and Dropbox to rocket their way to success by building small user bases into millions of active users in record time.

But here's the thing: growth hacking isn't for every stage of a product's lifecycle. That's where plenty of startups get it wrong. Growth hacking goes into hyperdrive during the growth stage of a product lifecycle-when you've validated your product-market fit, you've got a working MVP, and now you're looking to scale.

When Does Growth Hacking Work Best?

  1. You Have Product-Market Fit: Growth hacking isn't some kind of magic trick that makes users suddenly love your product. Without product-market fit, no amount of growth hacking is going to make your users stick. Growth hacking is about accelerating a product that's already showing promise.
  2. You Need Fast Results: Growth hacking puts your foot on the gas pedal. It is great for when you want quick wins, maybe you need to show traction to investors, or are looking to capitalize on a trend while it is hot. It's all about finding out what sticks and then doubling down on it.
  3. You're Focused on Acquisition: Growth hacking focuses on reach and conversion. It's about optimizing the customer acquisition funnel, reducing friction, and finding creative ways to bring more users through the door. It's not about keeping them around long-term—at least, not initially.

The Reality Check: It's Not a Cure-All

But here's the thing: Growth hacking is not a strategy for long-term value creation. Growth hacking will increase user numbers quickly, but it has no inherent value in enhancing the product itself. So, if your product isn't really serving real value, those users you gained will not be around for long. Sure, growth hacking gets you loads of users, but unless you know how to turn those users into loyal customers, you are building a leaky bucket.

Continuous Discovery: The Art of Never-Ending Improvement

What is Continuous Discovery?

Continuous Discovery is a framework where, with consistency, product teams engage with users, gather feedback, and iterate on their product. It's about continuous challenging of your product against market needs, competitors, and user expectations - making it better every single day.

Think of Continuous Discovery as the cure for complacency. It's about not falling into that trap of "We've got a good product, let's just keep doing what we're doing," but more like, "How can we make this better? How can we solve new pain points? What does the market want next?"

When Does Continuous Discovery Shine?

  1. You're in the Maturity Stage: Continuous Discovery is ideal for products that have reached a point of stability in their lifecycle. You've got a good user base, you've figured out your positioning, and now you're looking at ways to keep users engaged and fend off competitors. It's now about noodling on new features just because you can; it's time to go deeper and refine what you already have.
  2. You're Focused on Retention: Speaking of Continuous Discovery, it's all about retention. It's about understanding why users stay and why they leave, and what you can do to keep them coming back. Rather than the "growth at all costs" approach, it's about building a product that will last.
  3. You Need to Stay Competitive: Markets are moving at a fast pace, and unless you're learning consistently from your users and adapting your product, then somebody else will. Continuous Discovery keeps your product relevant and makes sure you're always solving the needs of users before they even realize they have those needs.

Reality Check: It Takes Patience

Continuous Discovery isn't about quick wins; it's about the long game. You invest time in building processes around gathering user feedback, testing hypotheses, and iterating on features. It's not sexy, and it doesn't move splashy headlines such as "We grew 10x in 3 months!" But it is the strategy that turns a good product into a great one.

Growth Hacking vs. Continuous Discovery: Which One Should You Use?

Think About Your Stage in the Product Lifecycle

  1. Early Stage: Focus on Product-Market Fit First Neither of these frameworks should be top of mind for you, if you're just getting started in building your product. The priority first and foremost should be to build a product that solves some existing problem for a set of users. Growth hacking or continuous discovery shouldn't even be on your radar until you have nailed the product-market fit. No amount of hacks or iterations is going to help a product nobody wants.
  2. Growth Stage: Growth Hacking is Your Weapon Having found your product-market fit, now it's time to start pushing the momentum and scale quicker toward a bigger audience. Run experiments which increase user acquisition and conversion rates: A/B tests of landing pages, referral programs, or optimization of your onboarding flow. However, the dominant feeling in this stage is to scale what works rather than trying to fix what doesn't.
  3. Maturity Stage: Go to Continuous Discovery After the first wave of growth, your product requires a different kind of love. That's where Continuous Discovery comes into play-get better retention and lower churn by making your product indispensable for users. Keep user interviews running; keep A/B testing new features, and stay superclosely connected with the ways users use your product.

Understand Your Business Goals

It also depends on your choice for what you're trying to achieve:

  • Need more users? Go with growth hacking. It's all about expanding your reach.
  • Want to keep the users you already have? Focus on continuous discovery. It's about deepening your product's connection with your audience.
  • Aiming to expand into new markets? Growth hacking can help you test different markets quickly.
  • Want to make your existing product better to make it long-term successful? Continuous Discovery keeps you at the edge with the shifting market.

Can You Mix Growth Hacking with Continuous Discovery?

The best products take a little bit of both. Think of it like knowing when to sprint and pace yourself for the marathon. You might be super heavy with growth hacking early on, building up your user base, but as you mature you shift into Continuous Discovery in order to make sure those users are staying happy and remain engaged.

You might use growth hacking to launch a new feature or campaign, then apply the principles of Continuous Discovery to iteratively improve that feature with user feedback. It is not one or the other; it is rather when to use which one.

Final Thoughts: Growth Hacking or Continuous Discovery?

So, what's better for your product-Growth Hacking or Continuous Discovery? The answer is: it depends. It depends on where your product currently is in its lifecycle and your business goals, and how you want to balance short-term wins with long-term stability.

If one's at the growth stage, then use Growth Hacking to take one's product to new heights. When the dust settles, put on another pair of glasses-Continuous Discovery-so those users will stick for the long haul. Remember, growth without retention is just a temporary boost, while retention without growth is a slow decline. Get the balance just right, and one will have a product that not only grows but thrives.